[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":70},["ShallowReactive",2],{"header-counts":3,"footer-counts":6,"prompt-tech-architecture-eval":9},{"tools":4,"reviews":5},65,7,{"tools":4,"reviews":5,"playbooks":7,"news":8},10,8,{"id":10,"title":11,"body":12,"description":54,"extension":55,"meta":56,"navigation":57,"path":58,"seo":59,"stem":60,"tags":61,"targetTools":65,"__hash__":69},"prompts\u002Fprompts\u002Ftech-architecture-eval.md","技术方案评估 Prompt：让 AI 像架构师一样评估方案",{"type":13,"value":14,"toc":47},"minimark",[15,19,23,27,38,41,44],[16,17,18],"h2",{"id":18},"用法",[20,21,22],"p",{},"把两个或多个备选方案的技术背景粘进来，配合下面的 prompt。",[16,24,26],{"id":25},"prompt","Prompt",[28,29,35],"pre",{"className":30,"code":32,"language":33,"meta":34},[31],"language-text","我正在评估以下技术方案，请像资深架构师一样帮我分析。不要给泛泛的建议，按以下结构输出：\n\n## 方案概要\n（每个方案 1 句话总结核心思路）\n\n## 五维评分（1-5 分）\n\n| 维度 | 方案 A | 方案 B | 说明 |\n|---|---|---|---|\n| 开发效率 | ? | ? | 搭起来快不快 |\n| 可维护性 | ? | ? | 半年后好不好改 |\n| 性能 | ? | ? | 预期吞吐量级 |\n| 生态成熟度 | ? | ? | 社区\u002F文档\u002F工具链 |\n| 团队匹配度 | ? | ? | 现有团队技能栈是否匹配 |\n\n## 风险矩阵\n\n列出每个方案的 Top 3 风险，按「概率 × 影响」排序：\n- 风险描述\n- 概率（高\u002F中\u002F低）\n- 影响（高\u002F中\u002F低）\n- 缓解措施\n\n## 迁移成本\n如果现在从方案 A 切到方案 B，需要改什么？列出具体的改动点和工作量估算。\n\n## 你的推荐\n基于以上分析，你推荐哪个方案？给出理由（不超过 3 条）。\n\n## 你不确定的地方\n列出你在评估中信息不足、需要我补充确认的点。不要猜。\n\n---\n\n方案背景：\n（粘贴你的方案详情）\n","text","",[36,37,32],"code",{"__ignoreMap":34},[16,39,40],{"id":40},"效果",[20,42,43],{},"不加 prompt 时 AI 通常说「两个都很好，看你的需求」——正确但没用。",[20,45,46],{},"加了这条 prompt 后 AI 被迫给出具体评分、风险和推荐，而且最后的「不确定的地方」经常能帮你发现自己遗漏的考量点。",{"title":34,"searchDepth":48,"depth":48,"links":49},3,[50,52,53],{"id":18,"depth":51,"text":18},2,{"id":25,"depth":51,"text":26},{"id":40,"depth":51,"text":40},"选型时让 AI 帮你评估技术方案，常常拿到一堆正确但没用的废话？这条 prompt 强制 AI 从 5 个维度打分、给出风险矩阵和迁移成本。","md",{},true,"\u002Fprompts\u002Ftech-architecture-eval",{"title":11,"description":54},"prompts\u002Ftech-architecture-eval",[62,63,64],"架构","选型","评估",[66,67,68],"Claude","Cursor","ChatGPT","se7MVQ8tk2uWOvn5iJwqASB688Vgv_lvnfay0y5g1ZY",1782316489341]